Categories
Uncategorized

What Too Much Toast Taught Me about the Paradox of Change

I feel vulnerable telling you this, but there have been periods in my life where I’ve eaten a lot of buttered toast. At night, after a long day at the office, I’d get home and just devour toast with too much butter. As I’m eating the toast, I wouldn’t say I’m particularly happy about it.

 

Eventually, I hit what I now call my “Peak Toast” period, eating six, sometimes seven slices a night.

 

It was getting out of hand. 

 

The Paradoxical Theory of Change

 

During this time, I was also learning about the Paradoxical Theory of Change, the concept that change happens when you stop focusing on the person you want to become and instead turn your attention to who you are now, and the reasons for your current behaviors. By paying attention to your present experiences, thoughts, and feelings, you can learn new ways to support the hidden motivations behind your behaviors, and ultimately, the change will occur as a natural process. 

 

This way of looking at my problem helped me discover the reasons behind my actions—helped me to ask myself, “Alright, let’s make this real. What’s the value I get from eating all this toast?” 

 

If you’ve found yourself wrestling with behaviors antithetical to the person you want to be and want to hear more about what the Paradoxical Theory of Change can teach you about leadership, watch my video: Peak Toast.

 

 

The Paradoxical Theory of Change isn’t just a powerful tool for self-realization, it can also help you work through situations in the workplace where you are running into resistance from others. 

 

Are you trying to drive organizational changes, but team members or stakeholders just aren’t there with you? Pay attention to the Paradoxical Theory of Change and turn your attention to the behaviors you see right now instead of focusing solely on the changes you’re driving.

 

Curious how you can enroll your team in your change vision? So many leaders I know struggle with team members and stakeholders who either don’t see the vision or don’t like it. They encounter resistance. Some of my most impactful work comes from helping leaders develop the skills of influence they need to create cohesive, empowered teams. It all starts with learning how to work with resistance effectively. My free video Understanding the Levels of Resistance teaches you some of my best strategies for working with resistance. Download it now.

Categories
Uncategorized

Can listening help your boss win? 

“Chris, I want you to make this your highest priority!” 

 

My boss was pretty excitable, so I was no stranger to being yelled at across the trading desk. Still, this struck me as a particular gem of absurdity. 

 

“Sounds good, Dave. But… [out came the project management spreadsheet] what about all of these other projects that you’ve also told me are my highest priority?” 

 

I didn’t want to disappoint my boss—but I also didn’t see how all of these “highest priorities,” including some projects I was particularly excited to move forward, came together.

 

It was frustrating to feel like I was always being pulled in a new direction, and I didn’t know how to work with my boss. 

 

I didn’t have the secret question then. 

 

It’s a question so powerful that many of my clients have used it to build trust with their bosses, work on what they’re most excited about, succeed with high-profile projects, and get promoted. 

 

What are your objectives?

 

(Which is just a fancy way of asking “why?”)

 

Why does this question work? 

 

It’s because our bosses are people too (something that we often forget!). 

 

They have desires, they have beliefs. 

 

They have mandates from their bosses and needs like ego, gratification, and promotion that they need to meet. 

 

They have their own strengths and weaknesses, their own blind spots. 

 

Bosses are just like us in many ways. 🙂 

 

So, when you see a vexing problem, particularly one that stretches beyond your ambit—like poor collaboration with a remote team or tools that don’t work very well—take a moment before you start fantasizing about how you would engineer a solution.

 

I see folks get stuck and frustrated at this moment because their boss doesn’t support the change. That makes sense! You see a clear problem. “If only they got it! I could solve this problem.”

 

But your boss may not actually care about the problem. 

 

Bosses like to solve their problems, not your problems. 

 

The first thing you need to do is uncover what your boss cares about.  

 

The good news is that we can take steps to make these shifts. 

 

So how do you figure out what your boss wants? 

 

You use curiosity and listening to find out what’s important to them, to explore their motivations and what they’re trying to do. 

 

Ask questions!

  • What’s the most important thing you’re working on right now? 
  • What are your top priorities this quarter? 
  • What are you hoping to get from this project/the projects that are on our plate as a team? 

 

Start a conversation. Listen. Empathize. Reflect back. 

 

You need to understand their perspective before you can move your ideas forward (even if your ideas are, and I say this objectively, obviously brilliant). 

 

Move toward what negotiator Chris Voss calls the “That’s right” moment. You know that you’ve nailed it when your listening and reflecting creates an opening for your boss to affirm what you’ve said: “Yes, that’s right! That’s exactly why this is important.” 

 

Let’s imagine that you’re an operations manager for an industrial plant; your boss, Sandy, is the plant manager. You’ve scheduled thirty minutes for a 1:1 with them and you want to talk about how you could solve some of the challenges you’ve been seeing with the purchasing group—which is a corporate function. 

 

The typical approach would be to start the meeting by advocating for the solution you see. “We need to change how purchasing works. Here’s why.” 

 

But that’s rooted in your perspective. 

 

Instead, you want to get to Voss’s “That’s right” moment by creating common ground before you try to move things forward.

 

So how do you do this?

 

You can still start by bringing your own ideas—but marry them with curious questions. 

 

You: Sandy, I’ve been thinking a lot about how we collaborate with the purchasing team and how it could be improved. But before I go into that, I was wondering: can you share the most important things you’re working on right now? 

 

Sandy: Well, a lot of folks have been retiring or leaving for competitors and, in this climate, it’s hard to hire. We’re also not immune to “quiet quitting.” 

 

Mirror and paraphrase, but stay curious: 

 

You: I see that your most important focus right now is retention and hiring. Is that right?

 

Sandy: That’s right. I’m looking at training, our wages, our hiring process—our talent strategy across the board. 

 

Deepen your understanding by asking why

 

You: Got it. Why is that so important right now? What are your objectives with this effort? 

 

Sandy: Sure. With the turnover and outages, we’re struggling to run at capacity because we don’t always have the people we need. 

 

Restate the why and get confirmation.

 

You: Ah, so the underlying challenge that you’re trying to address is our ability to run at capacity. Is that right? 

 

Sandy: That’s right! 

 

(It doesn’t actually matter if you’re right. If you get a “That’s right,” you’ve gotten confirmation that you’re on the right track. If your boss corrects you—“Actually, that’s not the reason. What’s most important is…”—well, now you’re on the right track.)

 

Only then move on to your issue. 

 

You: Ok, that makes sense. And that’s actually how I’ve been thinking about how we work with purchasing. There’s two challenges that I see that might be relevant here. 

 

Purchasing is (quite rightly so) obsessed with controlling costs. 

 

But, since they’re so focused on just-in-time, our people don’t always have the right tools or parts—which is demoralizing and disengaging. It makes us look kind of dumb—we’ve tasked someone with a job that we know they can’t complete. And, perhaps most importantly, it means that critical repairs are sometimes delayed and we lose capacity. 

 

I’d like to see if I can craft a new way to work with purchasing. Is it OK if I write you a quick summary and run it by you for feedback before I get started? 

 

They may still say no to your idea. But even if your project doesn’t move forward, you will understand your boss more. That’s a huge win. 

 

This approach marries intentional listening with a set of specific skills (open-ended questions and mirroring). It is simple, but it’s not easy. 

 

Listening is an intention, but it’s also a skill we can practice.

 

If you’re curious how I approach it, click here to be the first to get the details about the free Lead Curious Open House I’m running in December.

 

It’s an interactive workshop where you’ll get specific tools and practice with peers to make curiosity central to your approach to working with others — your boss included.

 

Click here and be the first to get the details when we firm everything up!



Categories
Uncategorized

The Subtle Art of Disappointing People

Leaders these days face a constant struggle to manage their energy.

 

For many of the leaders I work with, an onslaught of meetings obliterates time for focused work or sustained discussion.

 

For many others, an inordinate amount of energy goes into managing other people’s reactions. Predicting, like a chess master attuned to relationships, how others will feel about their decisions. Not just their bosses or peers but the people they lead, too.

 

In particular, this shows up when I’m working with leaders who are guiding change in their teams.

 

Change is hard. It involves shifting from a known state to an unknown one, from certainty to uncertainty.

 

And it involves disappointing people.

 

Disappointing people doesn’t mean being insensitive to what others want. But it does mean not owning their reactions—as strong as they may be—when they don’t get what they want.

 

I recently worked with a leadership team of a support function that had been working in an unsustainable way. The services they provided to their internal customers were broad and bespoke, and the team lacked a structured workflow. As a result, their team was getting burnt out and lacked the bandwidth to tackle the strategic work needed to improve their workflows.

 

But even in this context, leaders were worried that a shift to a new way of working might create fear and insecurity. Some employees liked the way they worked because they got to show up in heroic ways for their internal customers, getting things done at any cost. Others feared that, after restructuring, there wouldn’t be enough work to justify keeping them around.

 

Rather than get stuck predicting reactions to a change, this leadership team ran a participatory process. They shared the problem as they saw it and got curious about the perspective of their team. They outlined new ways of working, seeking input from the team and their internal clients.

 

Ultimately, they made a decision about how to move forward. They were open about the fact that they didn’t know exactly how things were going to play out and that they would learn and adjust over time. They were also clear about their decision.

 

Rather than managing everyone’s reactions, they used what I call strategic disappointment to move forward with clarity.

 

They shared that some folks would not be able to do their job the way they always had: Heroes couldn’t be heroes anymore.

 

They acknowledged that not everyone would like that—and that they were OK with disappointing people because they thought it was ultimately in everyone’s best interests.

 

And, since they had been asked their views along the way, people were mostly OK with that. They were participants in the process so, even if the outcome wasn’t the one they wanted, they got it. This was as true for the team as it was for their internal clients.

 

Instead of tying themselves in knots, trying to please everyone and manage to exception, the leadership team moved forward with energy.

 

The benefits of disappointing people do not just emerge during change. When you know that you’re going to say no to something—to a team member’s bid for a new role, to a hiring candidate you don’t think is the right fit, or to a request from a cross-functional partner—channel Nancy Regan and just say no.

 

Perseverating drains energy and serves no one. As the Dali Lama (supposedly) said, “Resistance to reality is the source of all suffering.”

 

What about you? Do you struggle to disappoint people?

 

If so, how might you make a shift so you’re managing your energy instead of others’ expectations? Email me at [email protected] and let me know.

 

Twitter | LinkedIn
* * *

Want to get these articles in your inbox? Subscribe here to join the conversation and download a sample from Meltdown.

3 Mistakes most leaders make with change

And how to avoid them!

download the free guide

* When you subscribe, you’ll also receive The Breakdown newsletter: tools and reflections on the practice of solving impossible problems. We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.